6 - Proportional & Bivariate
For our last module this semester, we focus on creating proportional symbols and bivariate maps. We started on creating a cities' population map for India to get familiar with proportional symbols especially when they are overlapping with other features. Good knowledge about the principle of hierarchical organization and visual contrast comes into place. For the India map, I focused on the following symbolization considerations:
Proportional Size: I used a minimum of 15 with maximum size of 90 so that the lower population areas would still be legible and visible to the viewers
Color Symbols: I used an orange color with a 50% transparency and then white outline enough to define its separation from overlapping circles. In addition, I used a lighten feature blend to smoothen the color overlays amongst overlapping symbols.
India: I used a gray scale color with a dark gray outline to create a visual contrast to the light gray base map that I added.
Overall, this makes an effective map to put the focus on the population data. The highest hierarchy in my symbols would showcase that my map is presenting the population count in cities using proportional symbols. I kept the legend the same using the orange color and then adjusted the classes to show 1000, 1,000,000 and 10,000,000 due to the large population range in India. I made sure that I add a white rectangular background to easily show hierarchy as to our map frame. I added an additional map frame to show where India is located around the Asia continent.
Again, when using choropleth maps where the viewer’s focus should be on the color scheme, it is important to use colors with less hue and saturation as background – in this case grayscale colors for the base map.
Bivariate
choropleth mapping using 2 variable that has positive correlation allows us to
quickly see the correlation between obesity and physical inactivity. This will
allow us to cater to states that might require activities within the area to increase
people’s daily activities which will help us to lessen obesity across states.
In addition, we can create additional studies on why the southeast part of the
US has high physical inactivity affecting obesity rates while the ones on the
far northwest of the country, although they are active, they still have high
obesity rates. This will then help us focus on activities that relates to our
map results and finding additional
variables that affect obesity rates in the far northwest even though they are
active and then different activities can be supported in the southwest by promoting
physical activities to lower obesity rates.
Comments
Post a Comment