M4 - Crime Analysis

I am one of the discussion leader for this module as I'm very familiar with the use of kernel density analysis. I had used this to compute for water table of are area of interest based on data points of water table in a series of sampling area.

For this module, we focused on Chicago's Homicide Crime Data for 2017 and then did a statistical comparison for 2018. We used 3 different types of hotspot analysis named, Grid-based Thematic mapping, Kernel density and Local Moran's I. 

Grid-Based Thematic Mapping 

We had spatially combined grid data over crime data and then summarized the numbers per grid cell. We only selected the top 20% of the overall grids with highest point count per grid.

Kernel Density

For this analysis we did not need a bounding area to spatially join our crime rates as it calculates the density of features in an area. This considers the occurrences of crimes that could put additional weight to an area when producing a hotspot for a certain radius or cell size.


Local Moran's I

This is a method I haven't used before as it uses a complex formula that computes hot spots, cold spots and outliers based on Local Moran's I index. Then a cluster/outlier type will be assigned per census tract that consists of high values (HH), low values (LL), outlier of high value surrounded by low values (HL) and outlier of low value surrounded by high values (LH).


Lastly we used the following results to compare the hotspot maps with the locations of homicides in 2018. The following table below was calculated to help us measure how useful our hotspot map is predicting future crime. 

Hotspot Technique

Total Area (mi2) in 2017

No. of 2018 homicides within 2017 hotspot

% of all 2018 homicides within 2017 hotspot

Crime density (2018 homicides within 2017 hotspot per mi2)

Grid Overlay

15 sq mi

159

27%

10.6

Kernel Density

25 sq mi

256

43%

10.2

Local Moran’s I

35 sq mi

270

46%

7.7

In conclusion, I would choose the Kernel Density analysis as the most efficient. One is that the combination of the % of all 2018 homicides within 2017 hotspots and crime density are both high in the said method. Second, the kernel density provides a much more detail point aggregation instead of grid coverage. Lastly, it pinpoints specific hotspot areas where the police chief can focus his resources. The other 2 provides a larger aggregation via grids which can be hard when the police department has limited resources.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

M1 S4 - Suitability Analysis / Least Cost Path

GIS Portfolio

Module 4 - Geoprocessing